Category Archives: Stupidity

Letters about “Evil White Men”

Some of the best letters I’ve read in a long time…
WSJ 4/28/2017

A ‘Snowflake’ Blizzard Buries Free Thought

In “Those ‘Snowflakes’ Have Chilling Effects Even Beyond the Campus” (op-ed, April 22), Heather Mac Donald suggests the source of “snowflake” behavior among millennials on college campuses comes from a cultural orientation that is contra-Occidental and that students view themselves as victims of a Western, capitalist, racist, heterocentric, gender- insensitive society. I’m an educator who sees college students every week. “Snowflake” culture has been incubated in a primordial ooze much more toxic: a very Western, very capitalist cocktail of consumercentric messages.

Many students view themselves principally as customers. The campus environment is a thing to be purchased and, like a purchase on Amazon, should meet the customer’s expectations or be sent away, instantly, with free return shipping and a full refund. We used to be participants and contributors; now we are customers and critics. This change of attitude is not unique to the university campus. It can also be seen in health care: “I paid for you, doctor, and I expect you to prescribe the opioids I seek. I’m not getting what I want out of this relationship. I’m the customer, I’m not paying you to be called an addict. I’m a victim. I’m in pain. What do you mean a referral? I’m leaving a bad review on Yelp!”

This kind of shallow, entitled, needlessly adversarial, accusatory exchange is not rooted in some anti-Western leftist hate campaign originating on college campuses. Instead it originates in the cheap postwar, one-liner bits of philosophy we’ve chanted together, phrases like “the customer is always right” and “the squeaky wheel gets the grease.” If these are the big ideas in society, don’t be surprised when the customers start squeaking.
Northwestern University Chicago

It’s worth noting that the very “human rights” that campus protesters clamor for derive from the writings of enlightenment thinkers such as John Stuart Mill, Edmund Burke, Immanuel Kant, Voltaire and many others, virtually all of whom were white males. Also worth mentioning is that the enlightenment philosopher who wrote the immortal words “all men are created equal” was himself a white male, albeit a slave owner. Prior to these white, male contributions, concepts such as human rights and equality played little, if any, role in human civilization.
San Antonio, Texas

How are these “snowflakes” going to get jobs after graduation? What business wants to hire a myopic thinker who is intolerant of others not like themselves and not willing to consider change? Maybe the professors all need to start preparing these snowflakes for their future jobs by teaching them the words: “Would you like fries with your order?”
Orlando, Fla.

White men need to recognize that the current campaign on campuses is a win-lose game in which their role is to lose, to be as Heather Mac Donald observes, “the targets of a pervasive discourse that portrays them as the root of all evil.” Game theory teaches that win-lose games are unstable because sooner or later the designated loser stops playing the game.
Midlothian, Va.

Poor critical thinking and an inability to understand history are at the root of this cultural temper tantrum. Try to find a tribe or nation in the last 5,000 years that has not at one time or another played the role of both oppressor and oppressed. The true tragedy here is the loss of a real history education and professors too poorly trained to provide one.
Boston College School of Social Work Boston


The GOP’s ObamaCare Choke

I have no idea what Republican senators are smoking, but they are f***ing out of their mind.  GET YOUR ACT TOGETHER, PEOPLE!!
WSJ 3/16/2017

Less than three months into full control of government and the chance to reshape the American system for a generation, Republicans are doing something no one thought possible: They are reinventing the circular firing squad.

Even a politician of such limitless cynicism as Chuck Schumer is agog: “We are on offense and united. They are on defense and divided, the opposite of what people would have predicted a month or two ago.”

Maybe in politics, genes really are destiny. Under pressure from a CBO “score,” the genetic disposition of Republican politicians is to go wobbly. The disposition of movement conservatives is to get out the long knives and start carving up other conservatives.

The result will be guaranteed political defeat for years if congressional Republicans choke at the chance to repeal and replace ObamaCare.

The Beltway bubble has never looked so big or real as now, to wit: The Trump-Ryan-Price health-care reform bill is too tough on Medicaid. Or it isn’t tough enough. It will break the Trump entitlement bond with the middle class. We want the 2015 repeal-only bill. Let ObamaCare collapse. What’s the rush? We can do this reform some other time.

The American people didn’t endure and survive the 2016 presidential election for this. The public that voted Donald Trump into the White House will drive Republicans into a deserved wilderness if they go back on the only promise anyone can remember them making the past six years.

The day the Republicans clutch on this reform, there will be six-column headlines across the Washington Post and New York Times: “Trump Abandons Promises on Health Care.”

It will be a fast ride downhill from there. That is because the health-care reform bill is linked inextricably to the politics of tax reform, the second pillar of the Trump legislative agenda.

The CBO score gifted the Republicans with $1 trillion in savings over a decade from the adjusted spending baseline, a number that would carry forward into the score for the tax bill, enabling the lower tax rates on income and capital that will lift the economy. (Remember that promise?) The cruder political point is that if health-care reform fails under media-driven Beltway pressure, the same timid people will next block the historic tax-reform bill with the same tactics. They will peck it to death with misgivings. Political courage used to have a postelection shelf life of about 12 months. Now it has the life cycle of a moth.

The logic is inescapable of what will happen if reform of both health care and taxes goes out with a whimper. As President Trump’s political capital and approval decline under a barrage of media-payback glee, and as the clock moves closer to the midterm election, Republicans will head for the tall weeds on everything. The Trump presidency will be over in under a year.

The conservative “friends” counseling Mr. Trump to give up now on health-care reform will move overnight to the next darling, say, Sen. Mike Lee who wrote on the Heritage Foundation’s blog Monday that Republicans should vote for repeal only and “take our time” on reform.

In the wake of repeal only, the U.S. health insurance market would be reduced to a shambles. After that, the next major party will be the Libertarians, because the GOP will be defunct. Maybe that’s what cable-TV star Rand Paul is up to.

An important separation may be occurring with this bill. On one side you have the status quo. It’s not just the American Medical Association and others who created the Obama-Care that failed and want its replacement to fail. The status quo is also the activist groups and pundits whose status and power are tied to keeping their opinions first and all else second.

Across from this status quo that is the one real thing that drove the 2016 election: the voting public’s desire for change. The 2016 election seemed like a radical upheaval, but it was mainly a cry for a restoration.

That means restoring the balance of power between the branches of government that was undone by Barack Obama. When some members of Congress say they “won’t vote” for the health-care bill, what they are saying is: “Let’s negotiate. I want something for my vote.” Mr. Trump’s personal willingness to do business with his opposition restores this normal reality to American politics.

The election was also about resetting the balance of authority between Washington and the states—a key goal of this reform’s Medicaid provisions. The Democrats are united in opposition because they’ve become a rule-from-Washington party. But the Republicans?

If this bill fails, there is only one Plan B. It will be a single-payer system enacted after 2020 with votes from what’s left of the Republican party after—Donald Trump is right about this—they get wiped out in 2018 and lose the presidency two years later. After blowing it on ObamaCare, why would anyone vote for them again?