Bravo! to Prime Minister Morrison. Don’t let Google tell you how to operate in your own country. If it applies to you, let me ask: Why are you still on gmail? You are giving Google information about everything you do, interact, say on that email platform. If you don’t think they are using that information, then I believe you are fooling only yourself. mrossol
The effort to impeach the U.S. President has grave consequences for Australia, as it will only empower China.
Whether President Trump is found guilty by the Senate of incitement to insurrection is almost as crucial to Australia as it is to the United States.
He is the first real obstacle to world domination by the sinister multibillionaires who control the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), responsible for the deaths of millions.
With little love for Australians or for that matter the ordinary Chinese people, especially Muslims, Uyghurs, Christians, Falun Gong, the free people of Hong Kong and indeed anyone who does not bend the knee to the Party, a world under their control will be a bleak place.
We Australians have long lived in a world in which a friendly and benign dominant power, first the UK and then the United States, has observed the rule of law and honored fundamental natural rights, prevailing over both Nazis and Soviets.
The problem is that the CCP has applied on a grand scale the realism once attributed to Lenin: “Capitalists will sell us the rope with which we will hang them.”
The CCP has lured a greedy American establishment with the wealth that can be made in a country of almost 1.5 billion.
Appropriately then, the House impeachment hearing was worthy of a Stalinist show trial: no investigation and no evidence.
There was no evidence for the simple fact that there is none.
He had specifically called for his supporters to be peaceful. Had he called for the crowd to storm the Capitol, there would not have been a few hundred, there would have been tens of thousands—more than could fit in.
Moreover, the FBI warned the police the day before that a planned invasion was likely, which is consistent with emerging evidence that it was encouraged by some police inviting them in as well as by agents provocateurs. The violent behavior of a few was totally inconsistent with thousands—indeed millions—of supporters in every Trump rally.
Nor is Trump a fool.
An invasion would have blocked the very investigation he craved for, an investigation of the mountains of detailed, verified evidence of fraud some very respected lawyers had assembled, as well as of unconstitutional changes to electoral laws. He wasn’t going to risk that.
As to fraud, Australians with minimal experience in electioneering will understand the core of his case, that his lead only evaporated when scrutineers were tricked into leaving by a claim that counting had to be suspended in several states.
That no judge, including a Supreme Court majority, would actually hear these reflects badly on the independence and/or courage of the American judiciary.
Admittedly, there had been an eight-month reign of terror—looting, burning, torching and 30 deaths over eight months in Democrat-run cities, approved by the Democrats, and lavishly so by the Vice President elect.
So why do Democrats and RINOS (Republicans In Name Only) want a Senate conviction which requires the “concurrence of two-thirds of the Members present?”
If a trial is actually held, it will be when Trump is a private citizen and will thus be of doubtful constitutional validity.
The reason is the elites are terrified of Trump and his support base of over 75 million, so they want him disqualified from standing, and they want this as an example to anybody else who dares try to drain the corrupt Washington swamp. This is, after all, only a continuation of the long campaign to overthrow him through the fiction that he had colluded with the Russians, where they even lied to a special court to wiretap his campaign.
Trump is not one of those politicians who go to the Capitol and are soon multi-millionaires, Joe Biden being a classic example.
And unlike most politicians, Trump spoke in 2016 about real issues that concern rank-and-file Americans; out-of-control illegal immigration; globalism; loss of manufacturing jobs; low wages; going soft on Beijing’s breaches of international law; aggression and brutal breaches of human rights; the manipulation of international trade rules and the currency with the theft of intellectual property; the global warming dogma, which punishes the United States and advantages Communist China; energy dependence on the Middle East; endless wars; the extraordinarily generous deal with the U.S.-hating Iranian mullahs; freeloading allies; declining educational standards; the large number of African-Americans imprisoned for lengthy terms over relatively minor drug offences; and activist judges making the constitution mean what they want it to mean.
The unusual fact is he honored more of his promises than any president, respecting the limits on his office and federalism.
If he is disqualified, the elites will hope there is less chance of the swamp being drained.
The managed decline of the United States will be resumed and a CCP-dominated world more likely, if not inevitable. And Australia will surely suffer.
David Flint, A.M., is an Emeritus Professor of Law and served as chairman of the Australian Press Council and of the Australian Broadcasting Authority.
This article first appeared in The Daily Telegraph.
I hope the Aussies don’t back down. mrossol
The Australian government is boldly pushing back against the Chinese Communist Party (CCP)—a newborn strategic position held by a government facing an increasingly hostile and antagonistic Beijing.
Recent aggressions by the CCP that in the past often failed to be directly addressed—are now being met with counterblows by the Morrison government, and it’s not just simply stronger rhetoric.
Australia was one of the first countries to call for an investigation into Beijing’s handling of the COVID-19 pandemic and has suspended its extradition treaty with Hong Kong over concerns around the new national security law. The country also is standing its ground against an escalating number of economic threats and intimidation from China.
Australian senators told The Epoch Times the resistance from the current government is in response to China’s growing contempt for international law, coupled with the gross mistreatment of its own people, and a seeping threat to the core values held by “Down Under.”
“China is starting to realise that not everyone will simply kowtow to their threats, be it geopolitical aggression, foreign interference or economic pressure,” Eric Abetz, a Liberal senator, told The Epoch Times.
“In all the circumstances, it is appropriate, indeed necessary, for freedom-loving countries to take a stand,” he continued.
Abetz said the “pushback” against the regime has been spurred by a number of pressing concerns, including “its ever-growing belligerence and bullying of its own people–Christians, Uyghurs, Falun Gong.”
China’s blatant disregard for international law through its South China Sea militarization is another concern, said Abetz, who pointed to Beijing’s intentional targeting of nations such as Australia that dare to seek accountability from China.
It started to take shape months ago, when Canberra called for an independent probe into Beijing’s handling of the pandemic. Meanwhile, Australia was one of the first countries that called for a travel ban from China.
Foreign Affairs Minister Marise Payne, who was first to signal the need for a transparent investigation, was soon backed by Australia’s Prime Minister Scott Morrison. In May, Morrison told Alan Jones on 2GB Radio: “What the world over needs to know—and there’s a lot of support for this—is how did it start and what are the lessons to be learned?”
Australia’s inquiry has since drawn the support of the European Union and a coalition of more than 100 nations. The move sparked anger from the CCP, which has since imposed an 80 percent tariff on Australian barley and a ban on four red meat processing plants.
One Nation Senator Malcolm Roberts said that although he’s pleased with the Australian government for making noise in response to the CCP, he will hold his assessment until after the media headlines subside. He said he was “doubtful the government’s actions will follow its words.”
“The [CCP] threat is enormous and affects every aspect of Australian life and lifestyles,” he told The Epoch Times.
“National security, economic independence, ownership of land and essential infrastructure assets, control of services, control over Labor and Liberal/National Party members of parliament and backroom powerbrokers to name just a few,” he said.
Roberts noted that the “world is awakening to the threat from the totalitarian CCP that has no regard for human life and freedom.” (India, one of the latest countries to crack down on Beijing, recently banned 59 mostly Chinese-owned apps over their border crisis, and plans to more heavily scrutinize foreign direct investments).
Meanwhile, Beijing also threatened to stop sending tourists and its students if Australia sticks to its call for a probe.
“We reject any suggestion that economic coercion is an appropriate response to a call for such an assessment, when what we need is global cooperation,” Payne said in a statement to The Australian.
She refuses to shy away when addressing China. In June, she criticized the CCP for creating “disinformation” amid the pandemic, adding that it “contributes to a climate of fear and division when what we need is cooperation and understanding.”
It’s been documented that the Chinese regime deliberately masked the total number of CCP virus cases in China in a bid to safeguard its image, both nationally and internationally. It has also been widely reported that China continues seeking to shift the blame away from its botched handling of the virus by launching a global disinformation campaign to manipulate narratives.
Andrew Phelan, an Australian-based medical technology entrepreneur who has spent most of his career in Asia, much of it representing U.S.-based medical technology companies (two of which have successfully prosecuted PRC nationals for IP theft), said he has never witnessed Australia respond to the CCP threat in the way it has today.
“I’m almost 54 and I’ve been following China since my first visit as a 21-year-old in 1988,” Phelan told The Epoch Times. “The current [pushback] situation is unprecedented … That courage has come with a cost and has put Australia in Chinese leader Xi Jinping’s crosshairs.”
“The significance of the pushback is that it is happening so fast, it’s involving so many countries and they are coalescing and forming alliances,” he added.
The recent pushback stems from a process of Australia waking up to Beijing’s plans and ambitions, according to Phelan. He noted that Australia is in a unique position, as no other country globally has benefited as much from the rise of China.
Neither the prime minister’s office nor the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade immediately responded to a request by The Epoch Times for comment.
Beijing’s Influence Operations
More countries across the world are beginning to stand up to Beijing as it ramps up its global aspirations through avenues that include United Front operations, the Belt and Road Initiative, and Confucius Institutes.
The United Front unit coordinates with thousands of groups to carry out foreign political influence operations, suppress dissident movements, gather intelligence, and facilitate the transfer of other countries’ technology to China, according to a June report by the Australian Strategic Policy Institute.
Groups and individuals linked to that unit have attracted an unprecedented level of scrutiny for their links to political interference, economic espionage, and influence on university campuses, the report stated. In Australia, businessmen who were members of organizations with close ties to the United Front Work Department “have been accused of interfering in Australian politics.”
The case of Huang Xiangmo was highlighted by the report’s authors as “one of the most informative cases of United Front-linked influence efforts.” Huang arrived in Australia “in near-total obscurity,” until “big spending and relentless networking behind closed doors has seen him swiftly ingratiate himself with Australia’s most powerful politicians,” the report stated, citing an article.
Huang was philanthropic and donated generously to universities, starting centers at two Australian universities. He also sought to mentor young Chinese Australians with political goals, organizing the Australia Young Leadership Forum for Chinese university students. His ACRI institute hosted a United Front official in 2016 and “also organized trips to China, supported by the Propaganda Department, for Australian journalists,” according to the report.
In one case, Huang reportedly withdrew a promised $400,000 donation to the Labor Party after its defense spokesman criticized China’s militarization of the South China Sea. Tim Xu, a former assistant to Huang, testified in 2019 that one of the councils Huang ran was a front for the CCP.
The Australia Security Intelligence Organisation (ASIO) later concluded that Huang was “amenable to conducting acts of foreign interference.” Huang’s citizenship application was denied and his residency rescinded. However, Huang’s networks and—United Front networks in general—are still active in Australia, the report stated.
Through the Belt and Road Initiative, the CCP has begun more than 2,900 projects valued at $3.87 trillion. The BRI has been called a “debt trap” because Beijing’s predatory lending practices reportedly have left countries vulnerable to China’s aggressive influence campaigns.
In October 2019, Victoria formally signed onto the initiative under Premier Daniel Andrews and Chinese ambassador to Australia Cheng Jingye; Victoria is the only state in Australia to have joined the initiative.
Former Victorian Premier Jeff Kennett told Sky News in a July 13 interview that the move would be the “undoing of this government,” labeling it as “an expansionist policy.”
Meanwhile, the Confucius Institutes located across Australia’s educational institutions have also attracted controversy. Late last year, the New South Wales Department of Education banned the program from being taught at the state’s public schools.
The institutes, overseen with heavy involvement from the United Front Work Department, have “generated controversy for more than a decade for their effects on academic freedom and influence on universities,” according to the Strategic Policy Institute report. China has claimed that the aim of the CIs is purely to strengthen Chinese language learning and culture.
The institutes aim to push a foreign policy goal of making the regime not only an economic superpower, but also a cultural one.
Abetz said unless the regime is brought to account early on, “they will continue their unacceptable practices until their domination becomes too reprehensible that conflict ensues.”
Australia’s pushback is “most certainly warranted,” says Casey Fleming, chairman and CEO of intelligence and security strategy firm BlackOps Partners.
“It is the canary in the mine for the rest of the free world and democracy,” he told The Epoch Times. “The CCP poses an extreme and ongoing threat to Australia’s values and national security. The CCP works under stealth cover, leverages intense espionage, and maximizes infiltration and subversion to destroy democracy.”Follow Bowen on Twitter: @BowenXiao_
From a speech by former Australian Prime Minister Tony Abbott (2013-15) at the Heritage Foundation, Jan. 21: (and nicely done, I might add.)
Back in November of 2014, when Australia hosted the annual meeting of the G-20, it was by far the most important gathering of leaders ever held in my country; and it should have been a diplomatic triumph—but for President Barack Obama choosing to give a speech at the University of Queensland that was seen as an attack on my government’s climate policy.
At the time, there was pressure to rebuke him for discourtesy, but I chose not to, because it was the duty, I thought, of the Australian prime minister not to be critical of the leader of the free world.
Now, I have to say that on this trip to Washington, I’ve noticed that respect for the office of the president is not so common, even here in the United States itself.
That’s a pity, if I may say so, because he’s not just your president. As the leader of the free world—which the president inevitably is, by virtue of America’s singular strength and goodwill—in a sense he’s everyone’s president, and the world needs him to succeed almost as much as America does.
If the president is strong, America is strong. And if America is strong, Australia is stronger, Britain is stronger, Canada is stronger, and all the countries of the free world are stronger.
That’s why so many people outside of the United States follow each president’s triumphs and travails almost as closely as if we were ourselves citizens of this great republic.
And much to the surprise of many, given the dismay that greeted President Donald Trump’s election; indeed, somewhat to my own surprise, given my view then that Mr Trump was almost uniquely under-qualified for such an office, I think he’s been quite a success: his style sometimes grates, but he’s been a very good president.
Maybe it’s just been overtaken by Trump derangement syndrome, but for the first time in years the main narrative is not one of American decline.