Church of England Will Not Define ‘Woman’

July 13 | Posted by mrossol | LGBT, Politically correct, Woke

Quite disappointing but not a surprise, coming from “woke” churchmen. mrossol

The church was questioned by a parishioner.

The Church of England has refused to define what a woman is, saying that there is “additional care” that needs to be used in defining the word.
The group says that the definition of “woman” used to be “self-evident,” particularly in the context of marriage.
The question was asked when lay member Adam Kendry questioned the church during the General Synod.
Senior Bishop Rt Rev Robert Innes responded saying that there wasn’t an official definition, according to the church at this point.
Innes brought up the Church of England’s “Living in Love and Faith” project, which is “part of discerning a way forward for the Church of England in relation to matters of identity, sexuality, relationships and marriage,” according to the group’s website.

“There is no official definition, which reflects the fact that until fairly recently definitions of this kind were thought to be self-evident, as reflected in the marriage liturgy,” Senior Bishop Rt Rev Robert Innes said when asked to define the word, according to a recent report.
News personality Calvin Robinson argued that the definition should not be difficult: “The definition of ‘woman’ is not a complex moral problem,” he said. “It is a scientific and biblical truth. How can you trust someone who cannot speak the truth about such basic facts?”

The new argument about the definition of the term ‘woman’ centers around transgender rights and was sparked into greater notoriety when now-Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson was asked what a woman is during her confirmation hearings. “Can I provide a definition? No,” Jackson responded when asked. “Not in this context. I’m not a biologist.”
Conservative commentator Matt Walsh’s documentary titled “What is a Woman?” has also been ruffling feathers, particularly in the transgender-identifying community, for exposing the “lunacy of pro-trans extremism.”

Better in their words…